Soya Dangerous: Industrial Soya Trade Fuels Europe’s Factory Farms, Affects Farmers and Environment on Two Continents

Categories

Food

Net soya meal imports into EU grew 57.1 percent since WTO trade rules entered force

BRUSSELS – Decades of trade rules that dismantled or restructured farm safety net programs in the EU have displaced sustainable, domestic feed grain production and escalated dangerous soya imports from Latin America—a trend that has helped turn European farms into polluting factory farms while driving down food quality, according to a new report from consumer organization Food & Water Europe.

The report, The Perils of the Global Soy Trade, will be released today at an event at the European parliament attended by MEPs and consumer groups. It shows that the 15 European Union member states’ (EU-15) net soy meal imports grew 57.1 percent since global WTO trade rules entered force, from 12.9 million metric tonnes in 1995 to 20.2 metric tonnes in 2007.

“Through its acquiescence to industrial agriculture interests in trade deals, the EU has imported U.S. worst practices when it comes to factory farming—including an increasing reliance on genetically engineered soy-based feed,” says Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director of Food & Water Europe. “The CAP and the trade rules have made it difficult to raise livestock sustainably in Europe, which is now seeing the same trend towards consolidation that has already taken place in America.”

Other findings in the report show how EU factory farm demand for cheap feed exports environmental damage and drives down food quality:

  • Between 1995 and 2007, the EU-15 shed 1.7 million farms—nearly a quarter of all farms.
  • The number of chickens on EU-15 farms rose 10 percent from 923 million in 1995 to 1 billion in 2008; the EU added nearly 3 million pigs between 2004 and 2006;
  • In 2009, Brazil and Argentina were the second- and third-largest cultivators of GM crops, growing 42.7 million hectares of GM soybeans, maize and cotton combined.
  • Soy cultivation in Uruguay has surged over fifteen-fold in less than two decades.
  • Between 1996 and 2008, applications of herbicide glyphosate (sold by Monsanto as Roundup), which is used to combat weeds on GM soy plantations, surged fourteen-fold in Argentina due to rampant weed resistance.
  • Brazil cleared 3.1 million hectares of forest annually between 2000 and 2005—an area larger than Belgium each year—deforestation that can be attributed to added land pressures from industrial monocultures, especially soybeans.
  • The dietary shift towards cheaper meat products have affected Europe’s waistlines: the obesity rate in the UK more than tripled between 1980 and 2007, France’s nearly doubled between 1990 and 2006, and almost half (49.6 percent) of Germany’s population was obese or overweight in 2005.

“Intensive farming in the EU is provoking South America to mass produce soy,” says Kartika Tamara Liotard, Member of European Parliament. “Large food companies in South America are indeed using vast amounts of land to grow corn and soybeans, merely to enable us to feed our livestock. Since the majority of these crops are genetically modified, our livestock end up eating controversial GMO food. Furthermore, mass cultivation is also responsible for the deforestation, not to mention the displacement of local South Americans. It would be much better if the local population could produce and consume its own crops instead of feeding European cattle with it.”

“European farmers can grow the protein plants that Europe needs,” says Gérard Choplin from European Coordination Via Campesina. “Rotating these protein crops and maintaining permanent pastures should be required in all places where it is feasible. This will benefit soil fertility, biodiversity and biodiversity and reduce carbon emissions by storing it in the soil.”

“It is high time Europe found better ways to feed and raise livestock,” says Hauter. “The international grain and oilseeds industry has gone to great lengths to convince European livestock farmers that they cannot survive without cheap imported feed. The truth is, most cannot survive even with it—and those that survive are more vulnerable to price shocks. And as the multinational food conglomerates concentrate their control over our food chain, jobs are lost and private profits soar.”

The Food & Water Europe report recommends policies that will help European farmers wean themselves off of imported soy. These include removal of the soya concessions in the Blair House agreement under WTO rules, and additional support for farmers under the European Common Agricultural Policy so that they can return to producing more sustainable domestic sources of protein for animal feed and the local food from responsible farms that Europeans want.

Read the report.

CONTACT:
Eve Mitchell, +44 (0)7962 437 128, [email protected]
Gabriella Zanzanaini, +32 488 409 662, [email protected]

###

Food & Water Europe is a program of Food & Water Watch, Inc., a non-profit consumer NGO based in Washington, D.C., working to ensure clean water and safe food in Europe and around the world. We challenge the corporate control and abuse of our food and water resources by empowering people to take action and transforming the public consciousness about what we eat and drink.

Proposed Linconshire Mega-Dairy Could Generate As Much Waste as London

Categories

Food

 

Nocton dairy must not get planning permission, says consumer group

Brussels — Food & Water Europe has formally objected to renewed plans for the EU’s biggest dairy at Nocton, in Lincolnshire in the UK, saying that despite hundreds of pages in dozens of supporting documents, the application fails to adequately account for how the local aquifer can accommodate the massive needs of the dairy, and how to deal with annual waste levels on par with London’s.

The group questioned the economic viability of the plan for a herd of 3,700 cows (“reduced” in this second application after earlier plans were withdrawn), and said this in effect means planning officers have a dilemma: approve plans now that will inevitably lead to the full stocking level of 8,100 cows plus 650 calves in order for the business to have a chance, with all the health risks that brings for humans and animals, or approve a hugely disruptive and unpopular project that is unlikely to survive financially. The only sensible option is to reject the application.

Food & Water Watch Director Wenonah Hauter said, “It looks to us like this application fails in several respects on planning regulations, but the bigger problems revolve around adequate supply of water for the thousands of animals they want to keep and a place to put all the waste they will generate. Water from the local aquifer is already fully committed supplying homes and farms, and local farmers have withdrawn consent to spread waste on their land, so we can’t see how this is going to work. And that’s before we even talk about the impact on the local community.”

The initial number of cows at the proposed dairy will generate more waste annually than the human populations of Manchester and Derby combined, and the full herd annual waste production would exceed that of any city in the UK except London. In the U.S., despite regulation of waste, Washington, D.C.-based Food & Water Watch have found numerous instances where storage lagoons have failed and untreated waste has seeped into groundwater and town water supplies. A 2008 spill forced a town to shut off water supply for two months. With the proposed dairy at Nocton being sited over a fragile natural aquifer, this could cause huge damage to people and protected species, like newts, which are particularly sensitive to manure spills.

Negotiations are “ongoing” to secure changes to water abstraction permits to supply the factory year-round, but were not in place when the application was submitted, calling into question the operational viability of the project.

In addition, health impacts on communities living near mega-dairies include:

  • Nitrate contaminated water – Babies who drink nitrate-contaminated water run a greater risk of developing the potentially fatal “blue baby” syndrome, where their blood cells lose their ability to carry oxygen. Several studies have also linked nitrates in the drinking water to birth defects, disruption of thyroid function, and various types of cancers.
  • Water contamination – Arsenic and other toxic metals, antibiotics, pesticides, and bacterial pathogens where manure is spread on fields increase the risk of E. coli and Camplyobacter infections.
  • Dust particles and toxins from animal feces, hair, and feed can affect white cell blood counts and cause fever and respiratory illness in humans.
  • Ammonia, methane and hydrogen sulphide emissions increase the risk of skin and eye irritation, coughing and wheezing, diarrhoea, asthma, nausea, headaches, depression, and sleep loss.

EU Food Policy Advisor Eve Mitchell said, “We’re very worried about the impact on local people. Noise and smell are only the beginning. Experience in the U.S. shows that communities living near mega-dairies face a host of serious health problems, some many miles away. Given the huge opposition to the project, and the fact that it is simply not needed, we cannot see why anyone would take the risk.”

Mega-dairies have arisen thanks to farmer’s inability to get a fair price for their milk. Supermarkets are selling milk at less than cost price while increasing their profit margins and keeping consumer prices stable. Costs for farmers are going up all the while, so they lose money on every pint. “It is a scandal, and it is driving family farmers out of business,” says Mitchell. “Any outfit that comes along claiming it can succeed in those conditions will do so only by pushing more and more traditional farms to the wall, and may well fall victim to the same game down the road. If supermarkets diverted even 20% of their massive profit on milk back to farmers, we wouldn’t even be having the debate about a mega-dairy in the UK.”

Get the fully referenced copy of the 20 page objection or contact Eve Mitchell.

Food & Water Europe is a program of Food & Water Watch, Inc., a non-profit consumer NGO based in Washington, D.C., working to ensure clean water and safe food in Europe and around the world. We challenge the corporate control and abuse of our food and water resources by empowering people to take action and transforming the public consciousness about what we eat and drink.

Contact: Eve Mitchell, +44 (0)1381 610 740, emitchell(at)fweurope.org or Gabriella Zanzanaini, +32 (0)488 409 662, gzanzanaini(at)fweurope.org

Recommendations of UK Report on Deepwater Drilling Don’t Go Far Enough

Categories

Food

Statement by Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director, Food & Water Europe

Brussels – “The newly published report by the UK’s Energy and Climate Committee on the implications of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill for deepwater drilling on the UK Continental Shelf fully reaffirms Food & Water Europe’s position on the specific dangers of deepwater drilling in the region.”

“The conclusions and recommendations of the report affirm the warnings that we flagged more than six months ago following the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The lack of investment into safety technology by oil companies, leads to their inability to prepare for ‘high consequence, low probability’ events. Furthermore, an oil spill off the coast of the Shetlands would be far harder to clean up than the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico due to the harsh weather conditions in the region. Finally, UK and EU legislation fails to clearly define liability in case of a large-scale oil spill in the region.

Food & Water Europe’s map shows how the ocean currents would contaminate the entire North Sea should there be a spill West of the Shetlands.”

“While we welcome most findings of the report, we are baffled by its recommendation against a moratorium even though the extensive evidence within the report itself clearly calls for one.

“EU and UK officials who continue to allow deepwater oil drilling before the proper precautions are in place and the necessary improvements have been made should keep in mind that their irresponsible behaviour will be held accountable in the event of an oil spill.”

Food & Water Europe is a program of Food & Water Watch, Inc., a non-profit consumer NGO based in Washington, D.C., working to ensure clean water and safe food in Europe and around the world. We challenge the corporate control and abuse of our food and water resources by empowering people to take action and transforming the public consciousness about what we eat and drink.

Contact: Gabriella Zanzanaini, +32488409662, gzanzanaini(at)fweurope(dot)org

DOJ’s Action Against United Water Shows Dangers of Private Water Operation

Categories

Food

Statement by Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director, Food & Water Europe

Brussels – “The Department of Justice in the United States is pursuing criminal charges against United Water, a subsidiary of Suez Environnement operating in the U.S, and two of its employees for allegedly tampering with E. coli monitoring at its Gary, Ind. wastewater facility, which reduced the amount of treatment chemicals used. The DOJ believes this is a violation of the Clean Water Act.

“Food & Water Europe applauds the Department of Justice for its actions. This indictment shows why our water services should be publicly owned. Private water operators are often based hundreds of miles away from the municipalities they serve. Their first priority is shareholders, not communities. Private operators are known for trimming costs in operation, as well as cutting jobs and raising rates in communities they enter.

“In Europe, we see the same situation. Even though there is strong public resistance to privatization, the public sector is helping the private water companies by providing finance, developing strategies, and even investing in these companies. At the same time, the ownership of private water companies in Europe has become all the more concentrated, overwhelmingly dominated by Veolia and Suez.

“In order to allow cities to retain control over their water systems, the funding gap for water infrastructure needs to be reversed. Instead of allowing private water companies to become increasingly dependent on state capital, Member States and the European Union should prioritize dedicated funding to repair our aging systems so that public leaders aren’t tempted to turn over water operations to private companies.”

Food & Water Europe is a program of Food & Water Watch, Inc., a non-profit consumer NGO based in Washington, D.C., working to ensure clean water and safe food in Europe and around the world. We challenge the corporate control and abuse of our food and water resources by empowering people to take action and transforming the public consciousness about what we eat and drink.

Contact: Gabriella Zanzanaini, +32488409662, gzanzanaini(at)fweurope.org

Coalition Demands to Put Access to Quality Affordable Food and Fair Market Prices for Farmers at Core of EU Agriculture and Food Policy

Categories

Food

Brussels – Proposals from the European Commission to reform the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 2013 show signs of fairer distribution of subsidies, according to the coalition. [1]

Despite this positive development the communication came short on proposals for stopping the collapse of family farming in Europe and dumping in developing countries, according to the coalition. The plans outlined also fail to address correctly climate change and the protection of biodiversity.

The communication from the European Commission lays out a range of laudable goals for reforming agriculture in Europe but fails to make strong proposals by only “adapting’ the current tools. Furthermore, it makes clear that the CAP 2013 proposal based on global competitiveness will let down its own farmers and consumers.

The communication suggests some elements for social improvements such as a ceiling for direct payments linked to employment, payments for small farms, and the maintenance of payments coupled to production to sustain farms in disadvantaged rural areas. However, proposals show that the European Commission continues to believe that agriculture and food markets are efficient and that “competitiveness” delivers a fair solution. The European and global crisis have shown the contrary: “free” market orientation and international trade rules have failed.

The coalition believes that a real reform is needed to promote environmental and socially responsible forms of farming, strengthening food production to feed people in their own regions, instead of export oriented and import dependent model, as well as promoting sustainable family farms instead of large industrialized units. This reform requires regulatory tools such as supply management, intervention and public storage in case of conjunctural sectorial crisis and border regulation to avoid low cost imports.

To face the big challenges for the environment, local production cycles can respond to the future scarcity and pollution of natural resources. The latter requires support of good agricultural practices, including animal welfare requirements on all farms, not just cross compliance linked with direct payments1. An agricultural model focused first on domestic market, both here and in the developing countries, is better for farmers in Europe and worldwide. The CAP should reward environmental sustainability, stop supporting unsustainable practices and achieve a balanced development of territories by including support for rural employment, diversity of food systems and locally grown production.

At this stage, the communication does not measure up to the expectations of food sovereignty, income and employment in agriculture, sustainable management practices and protection of natural resources. Real tools for supply management and market regulations are essential and will require strong political will to challenge the framework and the policies of international agreements. The coalition of farmers’ groups, social movements and NGOs in Europe call for a Common Agricultural and Food Policy for consumers and farmers in Europe and worldwide, not for the export-oriented food industry.

Get the whole statement and list of organizations.

For more information please contact:

ECVC: Geneviève Savigny (Fr, En) :+33 (0)625551687 [email protected] and ECVC/ COAG : Andoni García Arriola (ES), +34636451569 [email protected] – Paulina Novo (Es, En), European movement for food sovereigntyandanotherCAP+31(0)[email protected], GertEngelen(Nl,Fr,En,Es),Vredeseilanden+32 (0) 49738137, [email protected] Stanka Becheva (Ge,En,Bu), Friends of the Earth Europe +32(0)28931000, [email protected] – Willy Schuster (Ro,Hu,Ge,En) – Eco Ruralis Association + 40 (0)752108184 [email protected] Irmi Salzer (Ge) – Agrarbündnis Österreich (Au) +43 69911827634, [email protected] – Jocelyn Parot, Urgenci (FR ENG FIN), 0033687044930, [email protected] – Andrea Ferrante (it,En,fr,es) Italian Committee for Food Sovereignty, +39 348 01 89 221, [email protected]
___________________________________________
1 Indeed ,despite present cross compliance, factory farms continue to develop

La tentative de censure de film par Suez égale sa gestion des ressources d’eau: un échec

Categories

Food

Déclaration de la Directrice Executive de Food & Water Europe, Wenonah Hauter

Bruxelles – Cette semaine, un tribunal français a rejeté la poursuite pour diffamation intentée par Suez contre le film documentaire FLOW. Food & Water Europe applaudit le tribunal pour sa défense du droit des médias à examiner les activités des sociétés multinationales, en particulier lorsque ces activités compromettent la capacité de millions de personnes à travers le monde à accéder à une ressource naturelle vitale.

« Avec 1,2 milliard de personnes dans le monde qui n’ont pas accès à l’eau potable, propre et abordable, il est inadmissible qu’une société aussi puissante que Suez utilise son influence considérable pour masquer les faits derrière cette crise. »

«Bien sûr, compte tenu des performances exécrables de la société dans la gestion des ressources en eau, leur réaction au film est bien moins surprenante. De la Bolivie à l’Indonésie, Suez a laissé une traînée de débordements d’eaux usées, d’eau potable contaminée, de dégradation d’infrastructure, de scandales politiques et bien d’autres exemples encore de gestion bâclée à la suite de sa tentative de tirer profit des systèmes d’eau locale dans le monde entier. »

«Nous espérons que cette décision incitera citoyens et militants à se joindre à Food & Water Europe dans la poursuite de notre mission visant à exposer et contester les abus de ressources essentielles comme l’eau publique dans le monde. »

Food & Water Europe est un programme de Food & Water Watch, une ONG à but non-lucratif représentant les droits des consommateurs basée à Washington, DC, qui vise à garantir une eau propre et une alimentation sûre en Europe et dans le monde. Nous luttons contre le contrôle et l’abus de nos aliments et des ressources en eau par l’industrie en donnant aux citoyens les moyens d’agir et de transformer la conscience collective autour de ce que nous mangeons et buvons.

Contact: Gabriella Zanzanaini, +32488409662, gzanzanaini(at)fweurope.org