Blog Categories: Europe

EXXON Climate Change Denial to come under fire in EU Parliament

For immediate release, March 18, 2019

Brussels – After decades of concealing the link between fossil fuels and global warming, oil and gas giant ExxonMobil will be the subject of the first EU-level hearing on climate-change denial on Thursday 21 March in Brussels. The company, whose lobbying has weakened European climate action, is refusing to attend the public event; demands to revoke Exxon lobbyists’ access badges to the European Parliament are growing louder.

During Thursday’s hearing, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and the interested public will hear expert testimony on the history and political impact of climate change denial and the role ExxonMobil has played in this. Exxon has known about the threat of man-made climate change for over 55 years and has since done its best to spread doubt and misinformation – first about the existence of climate change, then the extent of the problem and its cause.

Despite claiming to have stopped their deception campaign, Exxon continues to fund lobby groups and think tanks spreading doubt about climate change. While the company is already under investigation in the US, the hearing in Brussels, put in motion by environmental NGO Food & Water Europe, will be the first time its misdeeds are scrutinised at the EU level.

Through direct lobbying, sponsorship of think tanks, membership in industry associations and for-hire lobbyists from consultancies, Exxon has established a solid presence in Brussels and is making its leverage in the political heart of the EU felt.

Having spent more than €30 million since 2010 to lobby EU decision-makers and organise numerous meetings with high-level EU Commission officials, the oil and gas giant continues to fight against renewable energy and peddles false ‘solutions’ to the climate crisis, such as new investments in gas infrastructure, as well as carbon capture and storage. A new Corporate Europe Observatory report, due out on Tuesday 19 March, will reveal the latest figures, connections and impact of Exxon’s lobbying ahead of the upcoming hearing.

Food & Water Europe Campaigns Officer Frida Kieninger said:

“Exxon’s deceitful lobbying has been slowing down ambitious EU climate policies for much too long. While Exxon has been keen to snatch up any opportunity to lobby EU decision-makers, it is refusing to show up at the EU Parliament hearing to explain its behavior. Exxon must be held accountable. We are asking parliamentarians to strip the multinational of its EU Parliament lobby badges, just like they did with Monsanto in 2017.”

Corporate Europe Observatory’s climate policy researcher Pascoe Sabido added:

“Exxon not only has oil and gas fields in Europe, but also considerable influence over EU policy-making. The company has used its leverage to deceive politicians, delay and derail climate action and push for false solutions like gas to safeguard its business. Exxon and other big polluting corporations continue to show us that they put their profits before all else. Our only chance to tackle the looming climate catastrophe is to keep them as far away from policy-making as possible.”

Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Europe and Food & Water Watch commented:

“Exxon’s influence by deceit must end. It’s time for members of the EU parliament to rethink whether they want to continue giving Exxon the privilege of peddling its fraud, and to consider the impact the company’s trickery has had on all of us as we teeter on the edge of climate chaos.”

————————————————

Notes to editors:

  • THE HEARING: The hearing will take place on Thursday 21 March, 10:30-12:30, European Parliament, József Antall building, Room 4Q1 (JAN4Q1), and will be live-streamed here. The draft agenda can be found HERE. To register and get access to the Parliament, please email your request stating your name, nationality, date of birth and passport number to [email protected]

PHOTO OPPORTUNITY: There will be a media stunt before the hearing with spokespeople on site, taking place at 09:30 at the Espace Simone Veil entrance of the Altiero Spinelli building of the EU Parliament.

PRESS CONFERENCE: After the hearing, Climate Science Historian Dr. Geoffrey Supran (Harvard University & MIT), MEPs Eleonora Evi and Molly Scott Cato, and Frida Kieninger (Food & Water Europe) will answer press questions at 13:00 at the Politikovskaya Room, PHS 0A50.

  • REVOKING LOBBYIST ACCESS badges to the EU Parliament: When in 2017 chemicals company Monsanto (since bought by Bayer) refused to attend a public EU Parliament hearing on allegations of regulatory interference, parliamentarians for the first time employed new rules to revoke parliament access for companies ignoring summons.
  • EXXON LOBBYING RESEARCH: Corporate Europe Observatory’s new research report on Exxon’s lobby spending, networks and influencing tactics in the EU will be published on Tuesday 19 March at 10:00. Advance copies of “Climate Arson: The strategies and impact of ExxonMobil’s dangerous EU lobbying” are available on request.
  • BACKSTORY to the hearing: Following the European Commission’s 2017 rejection of a petition by Food & Water Europe demanding ExxonMobil be held accountable for its climate change cover-up, the European Parliament’s petition and environment committees have taken it upon themselves to organise a hearing.
  • IN THE US: Exxon is already facing court cases in Massachusetts and the state of New York over its climate cover-up.

Contacts:

Food & Water Europe: Frida Kieninger (DE, EN, FR, ES), [email protected], +32 289 310 45 / +32 487 24 99 05
Corporate Europe Observatory: Pascoe Sabido (EN, FR, ES), [email protected], +44 7969 665 189/ +32 486 85 74 16

UN Committee Urges UK Government to Consider “Comprehensive and Complete Ban” on Fracking

For Immediate Release: March 13, 2019

Geneva/London/Brussels/Washington — In an extraordinary move, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) slammed the United Kingdom’s policies on fracking for failing to protect the rights of rural women, and urged the British Government to “consider introducing a comprehensive and complete ban on fracking.”

In summer 2018, the CEDAW asked the UK Government to “provide information on the measures being taken to mitigate and address the health and environmental impacts of toxic substances on women and girls, in particular rural women, due to planned fracking activities.” The government responded in November 2018, writing that it has “a robust regulatory system” and ”tough regulations in place to ensure on-site safety, prevent water contamination, and mitigate seismic activity and air pollution.”

A coalition of environmental groups (including Food & Water Europe, Talk Fracking, #BreakFreeFromPlastic, and Frack Free United), academics (Dr. Damien Short of the Human Rights Consortium and Professor Peter Strachan of Robert Gordon University), along with the Concerned Health Professionals UK and the National Union of Students, submitted a joint report to the CEDAW in January 2019 that strongly disputed the government’s claims.

“This U.N. committee is rightly taking the harmful impacts of fracking seriously, and calling on the United Kingdom to strongly consider ban fracking entirely,” said Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director of Food & Water Watch and Food & Water Europe. “There is a wealth of scientific evidence showing that women are particularly at risk from this dangerous form of drilling. Fracking creates unacceptable public health risks, threatens clean drinking water, and deepens our global climate crisis. This report is one more sign that there is an urgent need to ban fracking anywhere and everywhere.”

Other prominent supporters of that joint report were fashion icon Vivienne Westwood and her son Joe Corré, as well as actress and human rights activist Amber Heard.

Amber Heard said on Twitter, retweeted by Vivienne Westwood: “Only a comprehensive ban can protect women and human rights from the destructive impacts of fracking in the UK.”

Vivienne Westwood says: “We wanted to highlight the harm fracking causes pregnant women. Pregnant women who live near active fracking operations in Pennsylvania were at a 40 percent increased risk of giving birth prematurely and at a 30 percent increased risk for having obstetrician-labeled high-risk pregnancies. This is an example of the virulent, poisoning effect of fracking to all life and we are very thankful to CEDAW that it calls on the UK Government to stop it.”

The joint report served to bolster the conclusions reached by the CEDAW. The committee declared that it “commends the measures taken in Wales and Scotland” to halt fracking,” and is “concerned that women in rural areas in other territories… are disproportionately affected by the harmful effects of fracking, including exposure to hazardous and toxic chemicals, environmental pollution, and climate change.”

“We welcome CEDAW’s recognition that women and girls are disproportionately impacted by the harmful environmental and climate change impacts of fracking and its recommendation that the UK consider a comprehensive ban on fracking. Climate change is a gender issue and the UK must treat it as such.”, said Jennifer Robinson, human rights lawyer and barrister with Doughty Street Chambers in London.

_____________________

Contacts:

Andy Gheorghiu, policy advisor & campaigner, Food & Water Europe, [email protected]

Richard Hillgrove, [email protected], +44 (0)20 3601 3667, +44 (0) 7958 701 775

Claire Stephenson, [email protected], +44 07929 969664

Green Groups Challenge ESRIs Assumption that Irish Citizens Could Benefit from Fracked LNG Import Terminals

Dublin — Green groups – including Futureproof Clare, Gluaiseacht, Safety Before LNG, Friends of the Irish Environment, Not Here Not Anywhere, Love Leitrim, Friends of the Earth and Food & Water Europe – have challenged in an open letter ESRI’s recent Liquefied Natural Gas Valuation research bulletin which states that importing fracked liquefied natural gas (LNG) or developing a storage facility could reduce gas prices in future.

ERSI builds its assumption on the central perspective that natural gas has “environmental advantages relative to more polluting coal and oil” and that it therefore “contributes towards policy objectives that target environment quality and sustainable development.”

The signatories of the open letter heavily criticize ESRI for not willing to pay attention to the amount of existing crucial scientific evidence that proves the significant negative climate role of gas (in particular fracked gas) and the economic consequences related to the need to fully decarbonize our economy by 2050!  They point out that fossil gas is just another fossil fuel that we need to phase-out within the next 10 to 30 years – in order to avoid overshooting significant climate tipping-points.

LNG is a very capital and energy intensive industry. There is also an operational expense and a shipping expense. On top of that the process is complicated and requires up to 25% of the energy content of the gas.

All existing EU LNG terminals have an extremely low utilization rate of under 25%. A 2018 study, commissioned by the EU COM, on “The role of Trans-European gas infrastructure in the light of the 2050 decarbonisation targets” concludes that “the utilisation level of LNG terminals and import pipelines would significantly decrease, and some assets might need to be decommissioned or used for other purposes”.  Referring to Ireland it says that “capital expenditures will in the future be more focused on replacement rather than on expansion of the network” and that “the risk for stranded gas assets is in Ireland limited as it does not have LNG terminals or gas storage facilities”

For the signatories of the open letter, any new LNG terminal that is going online is very likely to become a stranded asset – making the Shannon & Cork projects risky bets for Ireland.

New gas infrastructure has a significant economic lifespan (usually between 30 and 40 years) that goes beyond the point when we’d need to fully decarbonize. The construction of any new fossil fuel infrastructure contributes therefore to increasing the risk of missing the EU 2050 climate objective and Paris Agreement targets by creating a “lock in” effect to high levels of gas consumption.

Referring to a 2018 study about the economic costs of climate in Europe, the signatories highlight that the costs of climate inaction will amount in hundreds of billions of Euro per year. This would contradict the assumption that investment in new fossil infrastructure will result in economic benefits for consumers.

Open Letter

Notes for the Editor:

——————————

Contacts:

  • Anne Marie Harrington, Community Organiser, Futureproof Clare
    Phone: 00353868645312, email: [email protected]
  • Tony Lowes, Director, Friends of the Irish Environment
    Phone:  0035 3 (0)27 74771, email: [email protected]
  • Meaghan Carmody, Head of Mobilisation, Friends of the Earth Ireland
    Phone:  01 639 4652  , email: [email protected]
  • Eoin O Leidhin, Gluaiseacht
    Phone:  0035 3873635729  , email: [email protected]
  • Andy Gheorghiu, policy advisor and campaigner, Food & Water Europe
    Phone: 0049 160 20 30 974, email: [email protected]
  • Eddie Mitchell, Love Leitrim
    Phone: 0035 3872239972, email: [email protected]
  • Johnny McElliot, Safety Before LNG
    Phone: 0035 3872804474, email: [email protected]

Más de treinta eurodiputados piden la paralización de la macrogranja de las 20.000 vacas en Noviercas (Soria)

En Inglés

Madrid, Bruselas — Treinta y tres eurodiputadas y eurodiputados de seis grupos políticos y once países han remitido hoy una carta [1] al Gobierno español y castellanoleonés para pedir la paralización del proyecto para construir una macrogranja con más de 23.000 vacas en la provincia de Soria [2]. Si este proyecto se lleva a cabo, sería la mayor granja lechera de la Unión Europea y abriría las puertas a un modelo de ganadería industrial importado de EE.UU. que no tiene cabida en Europa.

Una coalición de asociaciones ecologistas, movimientos locales y sindicatos agrarios [3] se opone a este proyecto por sus potenciales impactos sobre la economía rural, el medio ambiente, la población, la calidad del aire y del agua de la zona y el impacto global de la ganadería industrial en el cambio climático.

David Sánchez, portavoz de Food & Water Europe afirmó: “Los gobiernos central y autonómico no pueden permitir que este modelo de ganadería industrial llegue a Europa. Sus impactos en EEUU están ya más que documentados, no ayuda a las zonas rurales y no tiene nada que ver con el modelo de agricultura y alimentación que demandan las personas consumidoras”.

Florent Marcellesi, eurodiputado y firmante de la carta afirmó: “La UE no puede seguir permitiendo la preocupante proliferación de macrogranjas como la de Noviercas que además de convertir a España en el estercolero de Europa, destruyen empleos, nuestra salud, el medio ambiente, el clima y las oportunidades en el mundo rural. Ya hemos llevado esta batalla a Bruselas y desde aquí seguimos trabajando para que la UE apueste cuanto antes por un modelo agroalimentario sostenible, saludable, respetuoso con los animales y que contribuya al desarrollo del mundo rural”

Notas

[1] La carta y el listado de firmantes está disponible aquí.

[2] Más información sobre el Proyecto está disponible en:

Español: https://fweuro.pe/20000ES

Inglés: https://fweuro.pe/20000EN

Francés: https://fweuro.pe/20000FR

[3] La coalición incluye, entre otros, a Greenpeace, Amigos de la Tierra, Ecologistas en Acción, COAG y Food & Water Europe.

Contacto

David Sánchez Carpio, Food & Water Europe, +32 (0) 2893 1045, +34 616206942, dsanchez(at)fweurope.org

Florent Marcellesi, +3222837743, [email protected]

More Than 30 MEPs Raise Their Voices Against a 23,000 Dairy-Cow Factory Farm in Spain

En Español

Madrid, Brussels, February 27th 2019 — Thirty-three MEPs from six different political groups and 11 countries endorsed a letter [1] sent today to Spanish national and regional governments urging them to stop a projected factory farm that would house more than 23,000 dairy cows [2]. It would be the biggest dairy farm in the European Union and opens the doors to a factory farm model imported from the US that has no place in Europe.

A coalition of environmental NGOs, local organisations and farmers [3] is opposing this project for its potential impacts on rural economies, the environment, local communities, water and air quality, as well as the global impact of factory farming on climate change.

David Sánchez, campaigner at Food & Water Europe, said: “The Spanish and regional governments shouldn’t allow this factory farm model to be imported from the United States into Europe. Its severe impacts in the US are well documented: it doesn’t help rural communities and it has nothing to do with the model of farming that citizens demand in Europe.”

Florent Marcellesi, Member of the European Parliament and co-signatory of the letter, said: “The EU must stop turning a blind eye on the worrying spread of mega factory farms like the one in Noviercas. This kind of factory farming is making Spain become Europe’s dump while it destroys employment, our health, the environment, the climate and the opportunities in the rural areas. We already brought this fight to Brussels and from here we’ll keep on working to ensure the EU turns as soon as possible to sustainable and healthy farming, which respects animal welfare and contributes to the development of rural areas.”

Notes

[1] The letter and the list of signatories can be found here in Spanish and English.

[2] More information about the project can be found here in:

English https://fweuro.pe/20000EN
French https://fweuro.pe/20000FR
Spanish https://fweuro.pe/20000ES

[3] The coalition includes, among others, Greenpeace Spain, Friends of the Earth Spain, Ecologistas en Acción, Food & Water Europe and farmers’ union COAG.

Contact

David Sánchez, Food & Water Europe, +32 (0) 2893 1045, +34 616206942, dsanchez(at)fweurope.org

Florent Marcellesi. +3222837743 [email protected]

 

Food & Water Watch’s Wenonah Hauter, Fashion Icon Vivienne Westwood, Hollywood Actress and United Nations Human Rights Champion Amber Heard Ask UN To Consider Fracking Affront To Women’s Rights In The UK

American Statistics Show Pregnant Women Living Near UK Fracking Sites Have A 40% Risk Of Premature Birth

Brussels/Washington/London/Geneva, 25 Feb 2019

A co-signed letter from a group of environmental organisations and human rights activists to The Convention of the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) recommends that the United Nations ban fracking in order to protect the health and well-being of women threatened by the dangerous drilling practice in the United Kingdom.

Representatives of the UK Government are meeting CEDAW in Geneva on Tuesday, 26th February 2019.

In the Summer of 2018, CEDAW asked the UK Government to provide information on the measures being taken to mitigate and address the health and environmental impacts of toxic substances on women and girls, in particular rural women, due to planned fracking activities.

The UK Government answered in November 2018 that it has: “a robust regulatory system which provides a comprehensive regime for exploratory activities,” and “tough regulations in place to ensure on site safety, prevent water contamination, and mitigate seismic activity and air pollution.”

Activists have argued that the UK government’s measures are not sufficient to protect women.

Dame Vivienne Westwood, Hollywood Actress and United Nations Human Rights Champion, Amber Heard and Wenonah Hauter, Founder and Executive Director of Food & Water Watch and Food & Water Europe have all signed a letter to the CEDAW along with environmental groups such as Food & Water Europe, Talk Fracking, #BreakFreeFromPlastic, Frack Free United; academics such as Dr. Damien Short, Co-Director of the Human Rights Consortium, London and Energy Policy Professor Peter Strachan, Aberdeen, together with the Concerned Health Professionals UK and the National Union of Students.

They also strongly disagree with the claims made by the UK Government.

The group believes women’s rights are compromised because:

– Fracking is linked to higher rates of cancer, nervous, immune and cardiovascular problems in women.

– Pregnant women who live near active fracking operations have a 40% increased risk of giving birth prematurely and 30% have obstetrician-labeled ‘high-risk pregnancies, according to a Pennsylvania study by the Concerned Heath Professionals of New York.

– Fertility and menstrual problems in women can be caused from exposure the fracking chemicals including benzene, toluene and xylene (BTX chemicals).

– Miscarriages and still births can be caused by the heavy metals found in fracking waste water.

Amber Heard said on Twitter, retweeted by Vivienne Westwood: “Only a comprehensive ban can protect women and human rights from the destructive impacts of fracking in the UK.”

Vivienne Westwood says: “We want to highlight the harm fracking causes pregnant women. Pregnant women who live near active fracking operations in Pennsylvania were at a 40 percent increased risk of giving birth prematurely and at a 30 percent increased risk for having obstetrician-labeled high-risk pregnancies. This is an example of the virulent, poisoning effect of fracking to all life and we therefore want to support Amber Heard and the group asking for CEDAW to demand that it stops.”

Wenonah Hauter, Founder and Executive Director of Food & Water Watch and Food & Water Europe. “We’ve experienced the negative impacts of fracking on rural women in the US. The UK Government still has the opportunity to prevent this and must ban fracking.”